Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg sued by Washington, DC AG

Washington D.C., First Printed Could 23, 2022, 7:50 PM IST

The Cambridge Analytica scandal returned to haunt Meta aka Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg with Washington District of Columbia Attorney Normal Karl A Racine asserting that his office is suing the social media behemoth's founder for his position in Fb's misleading privacy practices and failure to guard tens of millions of customers' knowledge.

The AG's case seeks to hold Zuckerberg accountable for his role in Facebook violating the District's consumer safety laws by misrepresenting the protection of user data and their blatant disregard and misuse of sensitive, personal information belonging to District residents.

Additionally Learn: Restaurants cannot pressure customers to pay service cost: Govt

In a sequence of Tweets, Racine said: "Our investigation shows extensive proof that Zuckerberg was personally involved in failures that led to the Cambridge Analytica incident."

The AG's grievance notes that 'Fb has become a wildly successful and distinctive enterprise, deriving enormous wealth from buying and monetizing the info of these billions of individuals leading their lives in Facebook's digital ecosystem.'

The complaint further claims that 'Fb -- at Zuckerberg's path -- shifted its business model on this way because it acknowledged that it could be much more profitable if it may harness and sell the flexibility to dependably influence its customers' behaviour to third events. Fb, therefore, encouraged (and, at instances, teamed up with) developers and researchers to collect and analyze Facebook consumer data in order that it may higher discover ways to manipulate its personal customers’ moods and affect what they purchase and even whether and how they vote.

Cambridge Analytica Case

In March 2018, whistleblower Christopher Wylie publicly revealed that an organization known as Cambridge Analytica -- a London-based electioneering agency -- exfiltrated the personal knowledge of more than 70 million Fb customers in america with a purpose to influence the outcomes of the 2016 United States presidential election. 

This data trove included Fb users’ ages, pursuits, pages they have appreciated, teams they belong to, bodily locations, political affiliation, spiritual affiliation, relationships, and pictures, as well as their full names, cellphone numbers, and electronic mail addresses.

The personal knowledge of the greater than 70 million US Facebook users that Cambridge Analytica used to manipulate the election accounted for more than half the entire votes throughout the 2016 presidential elections, in an election that was effectively determined by only a few hundred thousand folks. 

Three years later, Fb and Zuckerberg publicly condemned Cambridge Analytica's information assortment, which in response to AG Racine, only demonstrates that what they say publicly is a part of an intentional plan to masks the devastating penalties of their actions.

The Allegations

Specializing in the Cambridge Analytica case, the criticism accused Facebook of actively encouraging corporations like Cambridge Analytica to use the platform to affect and manipulate shopper behaviour.

'What is most troubling is that Facebook seemed into Cambridge Analytica and determined that it posed a risk to client knowledge but chose to bury those issues fairly than cease them, as that would have damage Facebook’s (and Zuckerberg’s) backside line. As a substitute of coming clear, Facebook continued to help Cambridge Analytica win a United States presidential election,' the grievance mentioned.

Also Read: PM Modi's reforms altering India into a model landscape: Japan Inc

Last Up to date Might 23, 2022, 7:51 PM IST