Shell advisor quits, accusing agency of ‘extreme harms’ to atmosphere | Shell

A senior security advisor has stop working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil fuel producer in a bombshell public video of causing “extreme harms” to the surroundings.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for local weather change risks” and urged others within the oil and gasoline trade to “stroll away whereas there’s still time”.

The executive, who works for the independent agency Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 workers. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had stop because of Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and fuel firm of “operating beyond the design limits of our planetary systems” and “not putting environmental security earlier than manufacturing”.

She said: “Shell’s stated safety ambition is to ‘do no hurt’ – ‘Purpose Zero’, they name it – and it sounds honourable however they're fully failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes extreme harms, to our local weather, to the environment and to individuals. And whatever they say, Shell is simply not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett advised the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the implications.”

Shell was a “major shopper” of Dennett’s business, which specialises in evaluating security procedures in high-risk industries together with oil and fuel manufacturing. She began working with Shell in the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the trade.

“I can not work for a company that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the dangers of local weather change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “As a result of, contrary to Shell’s public expressions round internet zero, they are not winding down on oil and fuel, but planning to explore and extract rather more.”

Dennett – a legal justice graduate who has spent her career in analysis and consultancy – was inspired to cease working with Shell after watching news footage of Extinction Revolt climate protesters urging the corporate’s workers to leave. The motion’s TruthTeller whistleblowing undertaking encourages oil and gas staff to walk away from the business.

The consultant, who runs inside safety surveys and is based in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to be able to stroll away and “many people working in fossil gas corporations simply aren’t so lucky”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look in the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they actually imagine their imaginative and prescient for more oil and gasoline extraction secures a safe future for humanity”.

In late 2020, several Shell executives in its clear power sector left amid studies they had been frustrated at the tempo of Shell’s shift in direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions will be discussed on the assembly where the Dutch activist group Follow This can push for the company’s insurance policies to be more in keeping with the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has informed traders to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set more stringent climate objectives.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, could experience an investor rise up against his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote in opposition to it.

Sign up to the every day Enterprise In the present day e-mail or follow Guardian Business on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in little doubt, we're decided to ship on our global strategy to be a internet zero firm by 2050 and 1000's of our individuals are working exhausting to achieve this. We now have set targets for the short, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, although the world will still want oil and fuel for many years to come back in sectors that may’t be easily decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a possible windfall tax to fund cuts to family payments after the vitality trade reported bumper income fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition events to name on the federal government to usher in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and fuel producer in the North Sea spoke out against a one-off levy, arguing it would lead to the industry approving fewer projects.

Harbour Power’s chief executive, Linda Cook, instructed the Financial Instances: “The next tax burden will make it more challenging for brand new oil and gas tasks to satisfy funding hurdle rates, meaning fewer projects will be sanctioned.

“This is at a time when business is being encouraged to increase home UK oil and gasoline production and assist an orderly power transition.”

Harbour has advised the federal government it plans to take a position $6bn in the North Sea over three years as trade makes its case towards the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had obtained a £4.6m “golden howdy” from the firm.