Former Idaho lawmaker found guilty of raping intern
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26
BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A former Idaho lawmaker was convicted Friday of raping a 19-year-old legislative intern after a dramatic trial in which the younger lady fled the witness stand during testimony, saying “I can’t do this.”
The intern instructed a Statehouse supervisor that Aaron von Ehlinger raped her at his residence after the 2 had dinner at a Boise restaurant in March 2021. Von Ehlinger said the sex was consensual.
On the time, the Lewiston Republican was serving as a state representative, however he later resigned.
Von Ehlinger, 39, was found responsible Friday of rape. He was discovered not responsible of sexual penetration with a international object.
Von Ehlinger sat calmly as the decision was read, as he has all through the trial.
Afterward, 4th District Decide Michael Reardon instructed the jury: “This has been an uncommon case attended by many sudden circumstances, but I admire your attention ... and arduous work.”
A felony rape conviction carries a minimal sentence of one 12 months in jail in Idaho. The utmost penalty could be as high as life in prison, at the choose’s discretion. Sentencing has been scheduled for July 28.
As von Ehlinger was remanded into custody and handcuffed, he talked quietly with his attorney who removed gadgets from von Ehlinger’s pockets.
The prosecution remained stoic as they left the courtroom, however once they reached a decrease flooring they stopped to briefly to congratulate one another on the decision.
Von Ehlinger’s legal professional, Jon Cox, couldn't be immediately reached for remark after the trial.
The Associated Press usually does not identify people who say they've been sexually assaulted, and has referred to the lady in this case as “Jane Doe” at her request.
In a press convention, Ada County Prosecuting Attorney Jan Bennetts thanked the jury, investigators and the prosecutors who handled the case.
“Final but not least, it took an unbelievable quantity of braveness for the sufferer on this case, Jane Doe, to come back forward,” Bennetts stated. “I need to acknowledge the courage that she took in coming forward.”
Doe testified on the second day of the trial. She haltingly described the moments the alleged assault began, before abruptly leaving the witness stand.
“He tried to place his fingers between my legs and I closed my knees,” Doe stated.
At that, she stood up.
“I can’t do this,” she mentioned, rapidly strolling out of the courtroom.
The decide gave the prosecuting attorneys 10 minutes to seek out her to determine if she would return and resume her testimony.
When she did not, the decide advised the jurors they needed to “strike (Doe’s testimony) out of your minds as if it by no means happened,” because the protection couldn't cross-examine her.
In the course of the press conference, Deputy Prosecuting Legal professional Katelyn Farley said the moment Doe left the trial was “heart-wrenching,” but stated she and deputy prosecutor Whitney Welsh had ready for trial realizing that Doe might not be capable of testify.
“I feel it’s necessary that she decided to walk within the room, and she or he also determined to stroll out — these were her selections,” Welsh mentioned.
During his testimony Thursday, von Ehlinger often spoke in a transparent, loud voice directly to jurors, saying he and Doe decided to return to his apartment to “hang out” after consuming at a fancy Boise restaurant. Then they started making out on the sofa, he said.
“Issues had been going nicely, and I asked (Doe) if she wish to move to the bedroom,” von Ehlinger stated. “She stated ‘Positive.’ We received up, held fingers and walked into the bedroom.”
Deliberations stretched for seven hours until almost 8 p.m. Thursday earlier than the jury determined to interrupt for the evening. At one point, the choose summoned the attorneys to his chambers as a result of the jury asked a question. No particulars had been made public in regards to the jury’s inquiry.
When the allegations turned public — largely due to the legislative ethics investigation — Doe confronted unrelenting harassment from some of von Ehlinger’s supporters. Her identify, photograph and personal details about her life had been repeatedly publicized in “doxxing” incidents. One of many people who regularly harassed her was in the courthouse to attend the trial, but law enforcement banned the man from the floor where the case was being heard.
Throughout closing arguments, Farley told jurors that the case was about “power within the improper fingers” used to the “great devastation” of Doe. Von Ehlinger had social, political and bodily energy over the petite intern, Farley said.
“He used that energy to rape and forcibly penetrate her,” Farley mentioned, pointing at von Ehlinger. Doe resisted in several methods, she stated, highlighting the testimony of legislation enforcement investigators and a nurse sexual assault examiner who interviewed Doe after the alleged assault.
“Words present lack of consent. Excuses of ‘Why this shouldn’t happen’ show lack of consent. Yanking your head back and getting an harm exhibits lack of consent,” Farley mentioned.
However von Ehlinger’s lawyer told jurors the prosecution’s case was made up of “pink herrings,” and said von Ehlinger was a credible person who willingly took the stand to share his facet of the story.
The investigators and the nurse who carried out the sexual assault examination testified earlier this week. They said Doe reported being pinned down while von Ehlinger compelled her to perform oral sex, and that she knew he often carried a handgun and had placed it on a dresser near the bed at the time of the assault. The nurse additionally testified that Doe had a “goose egg” on the back of her head from striking the wall or a headboard whereas making an attempt to jerk her head away from von Ehlinger’s grip.